We're Safer? When CIA Got It All Wrong

News


Now we know that there was definitely NO weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Absolutely none. But the mantra of the Bush regime is that it relied on CIA and Pentagon inteliigence that turned out to be "wrong." And somehow this is accepted in the Mortalist media.

If the CIA could be so wrong, then our "intelligence" is not worthy anything. And yet we are being asked to rely on this "intelligence" to protect us from more attacks. Why would anyone in his or her right mind? Considering that the CIA has no clue where Osama is three years after 9/11, there is overwhelming support for this thesis.

The alternative is that the CIA's "intelligence" was cooked to order. Produced. Fabricated. Made up. Bush Jr, Rumsfeld, and Cheney insisted that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. So they demanded that the "intelligence" be custom-made to provide "evidence" for their faith. This means that "intelligence" has been so politicized and corrupted it's worth nothing to the American people.

So what is it? The former or later explanation for our intelligence. Either way, we ain't safer.